tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10345672.post3346650191818318754..comments2024-03-18T16:43:41.471+00:00Comments on Nothing To Do With Arbroath: Cat infers no more computer use for you todayarbroathhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03996975604444089064noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10345672.post-26387619150587344232013-12-02T01:19:52.954+00:002013-12-02T01:19:52.954+00:00One of my biggest current piques is the misuse of ...One of my biggest current piques is the misuse of "onto" for "on to." (And I'm now seeing instances of where "on to" is being used where "onto" should be! Gahh!)<br /><br />Here's a good article on that:<br /><br />http://gscediting.com/articles.html#onto<br /><br />Lurker111Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10345672.post-5454358761159504142013-12-01T16:41:18.750+00:002013-12-01T16:41:18.750+00:00Lurker111, be proud of your grammar Nazi-ism! Lang...Lurker111, be proud of your grammar Nazi-ism! Language changes and evolves but if we allow it to degrade to the point where communication is reduced to grunting or lolz or internet memes or text-speak we all lose.BoSnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10345672.post-85066115296046540242013-12-01T14:41:42.790+00:002013-12-01T14:41:42.790+00:00Fair point. :)Fair point. :)arbroathhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03996975604444089064noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10345672.post-10725540537083327122013-12-01T13:26:51.089+00:002013-12-01T13:26:51.089+00:00Isn't the rule, "speaker implies, listene...Isn't the rule, "speaker implies, listener infers"?<br /><br />Just another Grammar Nazi at work ...<br /><br />Lurker111<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com