While the breakthrough could predict the onset of a pandemic, it could also spell the end of manflu – the phenomenon in which men exaggerate the effects of a cold in order to get more sympathy. Dr Aimee Zaas, at Duke University Medical Center, North Carolina, said the technique could help cut down on the overuse of antibiotics.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhwWegYuqJzDkMvaQtG7cERmguDrmsFT8zN2hA3IAy8Pj_PEkuO0uEkwtZlUexm_LyiJgkKvKDhtBDTYdpCSp1xKepN_VGRkxBfx-zSszT6ICRYMyLZqJGhIZfSx1IlB1U3oZkZyQ/s400/manflu.jpg)
"Current methods for accurate diagnosis are time and labour intensive and are not always accurate. This means GPs are sometimes overcautious and may prescribe antibiotics unnecessarily, for viral infections. During a pandemic, this has real consequences as there is an increased risk of spreading infection."
The study, which was presented at the Society for General Microbiology's conference in Nottingham, looked at the blood of otherwise healthy individuals who had been exposed to respiratory infections including rhinovirus, the cause of the common cold and influenza. The team found each viral infection stimulated the body to produce a very specific set of immune molecules that could be detected in the blood. Recording the distinct blood signatures for each virus in a database and matching them against blood samples from other ill patients pinpointed the cause of disease with more than 95 per cent accuracy.
No comments:
Post a Comment