A daring dresser whose skimpy outfits have seen her refused entry at top city nightspots in Worcester says she is being treated unfairly. Lisa Woodman cannot understand why her choice of dancewear does not meet with the approval of nightclub bosses. The full-time mother-of-four says she only gets to let her hair down once a fortnight – usually a Saturday night – with her sister Sarah Woodman. They usually start the night in Lloyds bar in Broad Street, but head for the nearest clubs after 1am – either Mode, Tramps, or Velvet, all run by the same company.
But on every occasion for the last few months, the two have queued only to be told they cannot go inside. They did manage to get in once to Mode, where Lisa Woodman says, according to one of the bouncers, she is never allowed in “because of what I am wearing”. “What’s wrong with what I wear?” said the 28-year-old. “I’m not hurting anyone am I? I am covering everything, and I just want to have a good time.
Photos from SWNS.
“We never cause any trouble and we’ve never been rude to the bouncers.” Miss Woodman, of Gillam Street in Rainbow Hill, Worcester, says she complained to someone she believed was Mode’s manager over the phone, but has never been formally given a reason why she is seemingly banned. The nightclub say they have received no formal complaint, but said she was welcome to get in touch. “I just want to be treated with a bit of respect,” said Miss Woodman.
Dean Hill, the nightclubs’ director, said the clubs had “a responsible door policy”. “We expect people to make an effort and we have a dress code of smart casual,” he said. It is the venue managers who are on the doors, they make decisions on the doors based on our policies. They make judgements based on someone’s behaviour, their dress, if they’re abusive, and whether they have ID. At the end of the day, it’s private premises and we reserve the right to refuse entry for anyone.”
14 comments:
If younger club goers are wearing the same thing she should be able to too.
Blimey, I didn't think she was 28, I'd have guessed 40s! I guess bleaching your hair scowling just makes you look older.
If she does not want to get barred she should stop dressing like a well used second rate prostitute.
Four children, described as "Miss Woodman", likes to go out looking every inch the slapper. Her parents must be so proud!
I wouldn't call that look "smart casual"....
Does anyone else think she stole Gene Simmons's KISS boots? Or is that just me?
LOL at a club called Tramps not letting a chick in a miniskirt in.
"Um, excuse me miss, do you know where you are? We here at TRAMPS have a reputation to uphold, thankyouverymuch."
i like my women like i like my tea. strong, bitter, and a string hanging out of it.
I'm laughing at the "too old" bit. It's amazing how young 28 looks from my perspective. Hell, she's barely more than a kid.
Tea hee hee to Anonymous two above me. I think should only needed to wear those boots to get banned. Are they plastic?
I feel sorry for her kids. How would you like to have a mother who dressed like that in public?
Seeing how thousands of younger clubbers dress these days, her outfit seems inappropriate only because you CAN'T see her asscheeks, nipples and belly button.
By out-on-the-town-slut standards she's positively classy.
To (some of) the above:
dressing like that does not make her a slapper, or a slut. Who cares if she has kids and doesn't have a Mrs in front of her name? It is also none of your business what her parents, or her children, think of her and the way she chooses to dress.
Not my cup of tea, and she does look about 40 rather than 28, but it's her choice to dress like that. Stop being so bloody judgmental.
She has a good figure and nice legs. Why should her age be a problem? In any case she is still in her twenties.
Post a Comment