Sunday, September 02, 2012

Church sues family over 'offensive' headstone

Wilmer Frank Soles of Gloucester County, Virginia, was just "Soles" to his friends. He died from throat cancer on June 24 of last year. He had two last wishes, to be buried next to his mother and to have a nice headstone. "I never thought it that this one headstone would have caused so much," said his daughter, Shawn Carter. The $4,000 marker includes a picture of Soles' pick up truck and a photograph of him playing cards and drinking alcohol with his friend Butch. "I didn't mean to offend anybody by what I put on there and I really didn't. I didn't see anything wrong with it," said Carter.



But the two inch tall bottle of Kentucky Gentleman bourbon has drawn the ire of Salem United Methodist Church. The church owns the cemetery and says this marker is offensive, not just to its members but to other families with its loved ones buried here. Members asked the family to buff off the bottle. After a few letters back and forth, the family said no. Now the church is suing, giving the family three options: buff both pictures from the marker, remove the headstone altogether or remove their father's body.

"I did something to memorialize the way he lived his life," said Carter as she choked back tears. "I thought I did something good and now all of a sudden it's.... I'm sorry they don't like who he was, but that's who he was." Carter is the first to admit her father was a heavy drinker. "We had a lot of problems with him drinking and driving and but, like I said he never hurt anybody. Except for himself. He was a good man. I mean, that's all I did was memorialize the way he lived his life," said Carter.



The church had no bylaws in place that said members have to approve the designs on headstones. In the lawsuit the church claims the family has no property rights to the burial plot. Lawyers also argue the family "had no right to erect a monument or stone that is offensive to the members of Salem United Methodist" or to those who have loved ones buried there. The family has until Sunday September 2 (today) to decide to either fight the lawsuit in court or to remove the pictures or the headstone.

With news video.

5 comments:

Insolitus said...

"... the family "had no right to erect a monument or stone that is offensive to the members of Salem United Methodist""

But has the church listed what things would be offensive so people can avoid them? How else could anyone know what is allowed and what is not?

sooz said...

The article says that the church had no bylaws, so the church is out of luck unless the family caves in.

Anonymous said...

Well there is always something that's offensive to somebody isn't there....

Barbwire said...

I think the church people are offensive. Not to mention insensitive.

Anonymous said...

Methodists of all people have no room to criticize vices. Party animals, the lot of them.