The registrar printed out the documents and both confirmed they were correctly compiled. Mr Reid said they were married at a registry office on August 6, but by the end of the month police were contacted by Baker’s sister to report the situation. Police spoke to Baker and she had separated from Bradley the previous day, little more than three weeks after their “marriage” ceremony. Mr Reid said Baker told the officers she had discovered paperwork indicating Bradley was previously married. Both were arrested and Baker told police she believed herself to be divorced from her husband, while Bradley had told her his own divorce was, “done and dusted”.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb027/cb0270a633267d1f0b5d02e838cda8cbf7061d5a" alt=""
“As far as she was concerned she was divorced, but she had received no paperwork in confirmation,” Mr Reid told the court. Mr Reid said her solicitors confirmed they were instructed to go through with divorce proceedings, but there had been no communication with her husband’s lawyers as he had been unco-operative. Bradley said he had also instructed solicitors to commence divorce proceedings, but no progress was made. He said Baker had asked him to marry her and he agreed he would, when he was divorced. “Each, in interview, sought to tell police the other was responsible for persuading them.”
Baker, 43, of Brandon, County Durham, and 47-year-old Bradley of Gateshead, both of previous good character, each admitted bigamy and perjury. Imposing four month prison sentences, in both cases suspended for nine months, with six months' probation supervision, Judge Christopher Prince said: “You each fell in love with the other and wished to enter into marriage, and you each decided to deceive the other and the registrar, saying you were not married.” Both were also ordered to pay £300 costs and £80 statutory surcharge.
No comments:
Post a Comment