
When police investigated the break-in they found a pair of soiled underpants in the shop's office, along with papers smeared with faeces. Nearly $4,000 cash, an iPod and car keys were stolen from the office safe, while an electronic point of sale cash machine and till drawer were missing from the cafe.
DNA tests on the underpants concluded they belonged to Mr King, however the ACT Supreme Court found that was not enough to prove he was responsible for the break-in. Tests on the underpants found the DNA of another person, but police were not able to identify them.

In her judgment, Chief Justice Helen Murrell said she could not discount the possibility that someone else had been wearing Mr King's dirty underpants. "I am not satisfied that guilt is the only available rational inference," she wrote. "There is, for example, a reasonable [albeit small] possibility that the burglar was someone else who was wearing unwashed underpants that had previously been worn by the accused." She found Mr King not guilty of all charges.
4 comments:
I like the pants image. Though I'm not sure I'd care to have such a creature anywhere near my nether regions.
Beneath his 'comedic', bumbling, veneer he's an extremely nasty piece of work.
The distinct possibility that he could become Prime Minister sooner rather than later is very worrying.
For any non-Brits, this is the person on the underpants ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boris_Johnson
I always wondered how he managed to be mayor of London. He always looks awkward. His clothes never fit him right, and his hair is always a mess.
He looks kind of like Donald Trump...
Post a Comment