True Planter the Crap she is spouting. Maybe she is hoping playboy will discover her. It is sad she is using the bible. Maybe she has a mental health problem.
Me Again I checked out this woman she is charging $9.99 a month to view her web site but oh she lowered it $4.99 a month. Arbroath how did this clip slip through? It's okay , but this woman could be in a prostitution ring subtley using her website. I thought you might want to know.
Shame on you! She "could be in a prostitution ring"? Based on what? Because she's a nude model and does business on the internet? And even if she was a prostitute, so what? What difference does her profession, whatever it is, make in this case? And why should it be a factor whether or not a video of her reading from the Bible while nearly topless should appear on this fine blog?
If girls came knocking on my door dressed like this and asked if I had a few moments to hear about the bible I would say: "ABSOLUTELY, COME IN! I wanna hear all about your god"
Unfortunately all I get is mormom guys (good people none of the less :) )
I only got 1.12min into it (make of that what you will). I know it's the biblical story of a mob who wants to sodomize two angels but a kind father offers up his virgin daughters to the mob to save the angels asses. I skipped to abour 3mins in and Sachiko was giggling about it like a schoolgirl... but she missed a trick:
After checking out more of her vids- She's quite the number!
She turns the whole thing on it's head--- 9,99 to see the rest... ...Oh wait- What do I read from that figure when standing on my head? Hihihihihihihi!
I'm glad I you provided the link. When you read her website she makes it clear that this is satire and that she promotes secularism. Now...it's an interesting way of making her point (ehm,) and it probably gets lost on a lot of folks but...I'd say this is a great example of the internet in all it's glory.
Insulitus Oh I"m so stupid I can't spell your name. Did you really check out her website.? It is not Satire it is a clever coy to her web site. It looks she she is soft porn if I can call it that. I love Arbroath or I wouldn't be reading his web site he does a tremendous job. Naked on the Beach is not Satire . It is simply naked on the beach.
I did check her website, did you? You think her blog is just a decoy and she doesn't actually mean any of it? You are dismissing anything she has to say because she also does erotic work? I find that attitude quite despicable.
Well that is okay Insolitus, I did check her website go back to her blog and look at the link of her. Thank You for the education I didn't realize erotic work mean't being totally naked, We can go back and forth on this subject, You win she is not coy and does not want to share a now discount of $4.99 for followers and she is not showing herself naked and breasts so what exactly is she saying? for $ 4.99 oh excuse me $4.99 is a discount in the reduction of price is for members? You are right she is not a prostitute she is just going to sell naked pictures of herself Via innocently by Arbroath which I love his blog, Some how this innocent ,erotic ,satire and dancer got thru the cracks and wants members to join to see her pictures, I don't think Arbroath would really want that. I thought Arbroath was PG13 not x rated.Have a Good Day
You are acting stupid. What difference does it make what she does for a living? You act like there was something wrong in breasts, nakedness and selling erotica on the internet, and use the word "prositute" as if her being one would change anything. You also act as though it is wrong for someone to both do business on the internet and share their thoughts and opinions via the same medium, which is utterly ridiculous.
In the video she is very scantily clad, which I'm sure already disturbs your delicate sensibilities, but to see her naked you need to follow a link from Youtube to her personal website (which is the most ordinary thing in the world) and then click another link there. I would suspect that if every possibility of such "offending" material had to be searched before any Youtube clip could be posted here, we wouldn't have any Youtube clips here.
I would hazard a guess you consider yourself a feminist and that is one reason why another woman doing something like nude modeling disturbs you. According to feminist principles, is it ok to automatically disregard a woman's opinion because of their occupation?
<span> "I thought Arbroath was PG13 not x rated." - Diane</span>
This is PG-13 IMO. I only glanced at a spot or two, granted. However, you do have the choice of whether or not to click the play button; additionally, it was also your choice to further research "the subject." If you're new to the intarnetz, allow me to clue you in: Boobies rule the world. The fact that Kev usually keeps this place running with a cleaner G rating than a modern Disney animation has perhaps dulled your senses. This lovely lady isn't flipping her nips at you and she doesn't even seem to reference her breasts beyond simply having them. So um... that said... get over it. I look forward to watching this when I'm away from work with benefit of volume. But, then again, I get jokes. So there is that to consider.
27 comments:
brilliant! merci!
...Perhaps let that kid that became atheïst look at this (but <span>NOT</span> his mother!!!) ...?
...And Halleluya he found Faith Again...!
:-P :-P :-P
She has a great rack! Even worth listening to thecrap she is spouting
True Planter the Crap she is spouting. Maybe she is hoping playboy will discover her. It is sad she is using the bible. Maybe she has a mental health problem.
It is satire.
Me Again I checked out this woman she is charging $9.99 a month to view her web site but oh she lowered it $4.99 a month. Arbroath how did this clip slip through? It's okay , but this woman could be in a prostitution ring subtley using her website. I thought you might want to know.
as if church is free of charge.... i.e. most tv preachers charge more for thier dumb greedness they call view & "facts" (or "healings")
Shame on you! She "could be in a prostitution ring"? Based on what? Because she's a nude model and does business on the internet? And even if she was a prostitute, so what? What difference does her profession, whatever it is, make in this case? And why should it be a factor whether or not a video of her reading from the Bible while nearly topless should appear on this fine blog?
at least dear Sachiko isn't in any way frustrated about her sexuality - contrary to what "holy books" preach us....
If girls came knocking on my door dressed like this and asked if I had a few moments to hear about the bible I would say: "ABSOLUTELY, COME IN! I wanna hear all about your god"
Unfortunately all I get is mormom guys (good people none of the less :) )
This is silicon BS she will never have a proper mammogram
I only got 1.12min into it (make of that what you will). I know it's the biblical story of a mob who wants to sodomize two angels but a kind father offers up his virgin daughters to the mob to save the angels asses. I skipped to abour 3mins in and Sachiko was giggling about it like a schoolgirl... but she missed a trick:
Why no trampoline or jumping jacks? *DONT_KNOW*
I agree there would be a lot less atheists if we got preached this way..
many many many men will gladly give her a proper mammogram
& they'll be believers from the moment
& so on....
then its a good thing i suppose that she isnt reading the koran
She's hilarious! Quite a clever satire.
After checking out more of her vids- She's quite the number!
She turns the whole thing on it's head--- 9,99 to see the rest... ...Oh wait- What do I read from that figure when standing on my head? Hihihihihihihi!
I'm glad I you provided the link. When you read her website she makes it clear that this is satire and that she promotes secularism. Now...it's an interesting way of making her point (ehm,) and it probably gets lost on a lot of folks but...I'd say this is a great example of the internet in all it's glory.
Praise Something!
OMG. Please learn how to use the word, "the".
Insulitus Oh I"m so stupid I can't spell your name. Did you really check out her website.? It is not Satire it is a clever coy to her web site. It looks she she is soft porn if I can call it that. I love Arbroath or I wouldn't be reading his web site he does a tremendous job. Naked on the Beach is not Satire . It is simply naked on the beach.
I did check her website, did you? You think her blog is just a decoy and she doesn't actually mean any of it? You are dismissing anything she has to say because she also does erotic work? I find that attitude quite despicable.
Well that is okay Insolitus, I did check her website go back to her blog and look at the link of her. Thank You for the education I didn't realize erotic work mean't being totally naked, We can go back and forth on this subject, You win she is not coy and does not want to share a now discount of $4.99 for followers and she is not showing herself naked and breasts so what exactly is she saying? for $ 4.99 oh excuse me $4.99 is a discount in the reduction of price is for members? You are right she is not a prostitute she is just going to sell naked pictures of herself Via innocently by Arbroath which I love his blog, Some how this innocent ,erotic ,satire and dancer got thru the cracks and wants members to join to see her pictures, I don't think Arbroath would really want that. I thought Arbroath was PG13 not x rated.Have a Good Day
You are acting stupid. What difference does it make what she does for a living? You act like there was something wrong in breasts, nakedness and selling erotica on the internet, and use the word "prositute" as if her being one would change anything. You also act as though it is wrong for someone to both do business on the internet and share their thoughts and opinions via the same medium, which is utterly ridiculous.
In the video she is very scantily clad, which I'm sure already disturbs your delicate sensibilities, but to see her naked you need to follow a link from Youtube to her personal website (which is the most ordinary thing in the world) and then click another link there. I would suspect that if every possibility of such "offending" material had to be searched before any Youtube clip could be posted here, we wouldn't have any Youtube clips here.
I would hazard a guess you consider yourself a feminist and that is one reason why another woman doing something like nude modeling disturbs you. According to feminist principles, is it ok to automatically disregard a woman's opinion because of their occupation?
<span> "I thought Arbroath was PG13 not x rated." - Diane</span>
This is PG-13 IMO. I only glanced at a spot or two, granted. However, you do have the choice of whether or not to click the play button; additionally, it was also your choice to further research "the subject." If you're new to the intarnetz, allow me to clue you in: Boobies rule the world. The fact that Kev usually keeps this place running with a cleaner G rating than a modern Disney animation has perhaps dulled your senses. This lovely lady isn't flipping her nips at you and she doesn't even seem to reference her breasts beyond simply having them. So um... that said... get over it. I look forward to watching this when I'm away from work with benefit of volume. But, then again, I get jokes. So there is that to consider.
Depends on your brand of feminism, I guess.
I'm a feminist, and I don't have a problem with her.
I know that. Unfortunately the most vocal feminists are often those who would oppress women in a different way.
Post a Comment