A man who left a three-month-old child fighting for life after forcing a baby wipe into his bottom to prevent a dirty nappy has been admonished. Graeme McArthur, 39, from Cambuslang, South Lanarkshire, admitted endangering the boy's life in February last year. But at the High Court in Glasgow, judge Lord Turnbull described his actions as "misguided intervention rather than as an act of malice." It is unclear if the injured child will make a full recovery.
At an earlier hearing, the court heard how the incident occurred as McArthur, who was looking after the child, changed his nappy. The wipe was deliberately put into the child's body in a bid to stop him from soiling his nappy. The next day in a bid to remove the wipe using his fingers, McArthur caused significant internal injuries, including a perforated bowel. The baby's mother later took him to a local GP as he was quiet and pale and whimpering.
The doctor immediately arranged for an ambulance to take the child to Hairmyres Hospital in East Kilbride. When he was admitted, the baby was close to death and had to be resuscitated. He was then transferred to Yorkhill Hospital in Glasgow and underwent a four-and-a-half hour operation to repair his bowel. During the operation the wipe was removed from inside the child's abdomen.
A consultant paediatrician was of the opinion that the pain for the baby would have been excruciating. Lord Turnbull said that this was one of the most anxious cases ever to have appeared before him and said that McArthur presented as "a distraught and flawed man". Admonishing McArthur, he added that his conduct was the result of"wholly misguided intervention rather than as an act of malice". The ruling means McArthur's conviction is still recorded but he is neither imprisoned nor fined.
5 comments:
...And then after he's done his term, taken into the lunyhome for permanent indefinite treatment...
Leaving this man without being punished in any way is a disaster!!!. How camee didn't new he would harm the baby...would he tuck a wipe up his bottom to preventing him going toilet... didn't he realised that the baby was unwell after a day or two...please...he should be punished in any way...this is another idea of harming a baby for those problematic mum's and dad's who do horrible things to children, our law should be heavier on those who harm children with intent, it's easy to go to court and say " I did't mean to cause any harm!!"Once again, would he stuck a wipe up his bottom to preventing him to go to toilet!!!!????
I think I want to call Bullshit on this story. Bet the man molested the baby - that is what caused the internal damange and then pulled the whole wet whipe bullshit to cover up his pervertedness.
Either way, I hope he rots in hell. ..........after spending a few years in a jail cell with a 500 pound bubba who makes him his girl freind.
<span> </span>
Totally agree with WifeMotherMe.
How far up there did he shove the baby wipe that it wouldn't have been pushed out by normal bodily functions?
How can someone who's been on the planet for almost 4 decades be that stupid?
Post a Comment