The controversial new method is said to be less expensive and more environmentally friendly than running highly polluting crematoria or using up valuable land for graves. The departed would go into the sewage systems of towns and cities and then be recycled in water processing plants.
The proposals are being studied by the EU and if approved, it would mean the procedure could be used across Europe. However, opponents of the plans say it smacks of a Frankenstein callousness towards the dead and one survey in Belgium found many people found the idea "disturbing."
"The idea is for the deceased to be placed in a container with water and salts and then pressurised and after a little time, about two hours, mineral ash and liquid is left over," said a spokesman for the Flemish Association of Undertakers. The European Commission is investigation whether the resulting liquid could safely be flushed into the sewage system. Authorities in the northern Belgian region have yet to decide whether to approve the process.
Six states in America – Maine, Colorado, Florida, Minnesota, Oregon, and Maryland have recently passed legislation that allow the process to be used. Although experts insist that the ashes can be recycled in waste systems, the residue from the process can also be put in urns and handed over to relatives of the dead.
5 comments:
Soylent pink is coming!
As I've said before, I'm a fan of cemeteries, but we cannot continue to bury people. It is not a basic human right to dictate what should be done with your body for the rest of eternity. When you're dead, it is over. You had your time in this world, now it is time for you to decompose. It is not cruel or uncaring to find the best way to dispose of bodies. Why is being injected with chemicals and stuffed in a box any better?
I agree, but I wonder if this is really more environmentally friendly than a simple burial -- no embalming, no casket, no marker -- with the same spot to be reused once the body decays?
I've always thought the Zoroastrian sky burials sounded best, but we don 't have enough vultures (or cliffs) here.
I don't know. We have enough problems with water pollution from our urine. Can you imagine the pollution if we started actually flushing whole bodies? All the hormones and viruses and prions and bacteria that might not get taken care of by the "salts" (whatever that means) would just go into the ecosystem...
I've heard a guy in that business suggest you could use the residue as a kind of filler /underlayment / addition in tarmac in roads...
Post a Comment