‘The card had a big number two on the front,’ he said. ‘I was so amazed, I had to get two people to read it to be sure of what it said. It’s unbelievable.’ He said inside the card was a sheet of small paper stickers. ‘I suppose a child could peel a sticker off but how could they harm themselves with it, other than try and eat the whole sheet?’ he added.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ea7d/7ea7d3eb04e0e52cf89c0562b8e6aa4d9b2880b1" alt=""
‘But if that’s a worry they shouldn’t sell the card for two-year-olds. It just about sums up the world today – it’s gone health and safety mad.’ Mary Jane’s mother Helen, from Fremington, north Devon, said: ‘If it’s dangerous they shouldn’t sell it for two-year-olds and if it isn’t dangerous why put a warning on?’
But Barry Hartog, from Clinton Cards, said: ‘A card is for display, not a toy. It is suitable to be given to a two-year-old to be displayed on a mantelpiece but it is not suitable for a two-year-old to play with. ‘We had one similar case and took it up with Trading Standards. They are happy with the labelling.'
No comments:
Post a Comment