Sunday, January 15, 2012

Dead man charged $600 for running tap

An Ontario town is still pondering over whether a man who died suddenly, leaving the bathroom tap (faucet) running, should get a break on his water bill. Allister MacPherson died at his home in Port Colborne, Ont., Sept. 28. The water remained flowing for three weeks before his body was discovered by family members. Now his family is asking the town to forgive the $600 bill.

But town council is still mulling it over after its services director said policy is policy and the bill needs to be paid. Peter Senese, the city's director of community and corporate services, said waiving the cost would mean the expense would fall back to the city, and ultimately the other taxpayers.



Mayor Vance Badawe shot back at the family, asking if they are approaching other service providers – such as the hydro and gas companies – looking for breaks as well, and what they might have ruled. "I'd like to see their (other companies') responses," Badawey said. In the meantime, he said, the family is always welcome to come to a council meeting “and ask forgiveness from policies.”

The dead man's daughter, Cara Zandvliet, who had been handling her father's bills, says Bell Canada already gave the family a break by exempting charges to the final bill, and is disappointed the city won't follow suit with the whopping water bill. "I want to recognize this is a good town, but city hall won't do anything about this," Zandvliet said. Zandvliet said if she has to pay the bill she will. She just wished the city was more compassionate in the way it handled the situation.

3 comments:

frenchfarmer said...

Home insurance should cover it, if not he mav have accidental death insurance on his credit card agreement. Either way it is an expense caused by the death and should be paid by insurance.
I'm sure even the City Insurance has coverage for damages caused by accidental third party deaths.

Gareth said...

They sent a dead man a bill? Fine. He's dead, he can't pay it.

The way it works round here is that the bill is to the occupant not the property. If the occupant dies then he can't pay the bill. Whoever takes over the property is not liable for the outstanding bill.

Anonymous said...

This is typical bureaucratic BS that we Canadians constantly have to endure. They can easily write this off but would rather be stupid about it and make the poor grieving family pay for something as stupid as this. If it were one of their own you can bet it would be paid right away. They can't even give the dead a break!