Monday, January 23, 2012

Man who wanted to live like Bear Grylls in Scottish wilderness for a year died after less than a month

A man found dead in a remote bothy is thought to have been an adventurer who hoped to spend a year living alone in the Scottish wilderness. David Austin, 29, from Derby, was found dead in a hut by a railway worker a mile south of one of Scotland’s most remote stations, Rannoch in Highland Perthshire, on Hogmanay. His body is believed to have been lying there for several weeks when it was discovered, and a post-mortem examination found there were no suspicious circumstances behind his death. Mr Austin is thought to have told family in November that he was heading to the Highlands to live out his dream of surviving in the wilderness.

He planned to live rough on a year-long adventure, using techniques like those used by adventurer and TV presenter Bear Grylls, despite being urged to reconsider by family and friends. He is understood to have attended several courses in outdoor survival and bushcraft skills over the past couple of years with a view to realising a long-held dream of living alone in the wild. Mr Austin is thought to not even have taken a mobile phone with him. A number of personal possessions including a knife and a daily journal were found next to his body. It is believed he may have died of hypothermia. After leaving Derby, Mr Austin is thought to have travelled to Glasgow and then on to Corrour – which is the UK’s highest mainline station – on the West Highland line.



He is then believed to have spent his 29th birthday on 3 December alone outdoors, in the first heavy snowfall of the season. A hostel employee at the Loch Ossian SYHA hostel on Rannoch Moor, said: “He didn’t stay here. He told me he’d been camping in the woods on the north side of the loch that weekend, then he just mosied over to have a look at the hostel.” Mary McArthur, one of only four permanent residents in the Rannoch station area, said: “The story we heard was that he had taken a year out from work and was going to live off the land. And he was supposed to have walked down the line towards Rannoch station so perhaps he decided to take shelter in the bothy.

“But what happened after that, who knows? We heard he was well equipped and knew what he was doing. We heard there were no suspicious circumstances but weren’t sure if it was hypothermia, or a health complaint. At the end of the day, it’s someone’s son and a sad way to go in the middle of nowhere all alone.” His body was found in a remote bothy used by track inspection workers. A British Transport Police spokesman confirmed the man had been identified as a 29-year-old man from the east Midlands, and that there appeared to be no suspicious circumstances.

7 comments:

Annemarie said...

I agree
Bear Grylls is all about macho sensationalism not real survival.
Having been a student of Ray Mears for several years, I learnt the real practical stuff to safely spend time alone.
Albeit in woodlands in the south, then went on to teach army cadets. Even with what I knew i wouldnt try anything as stupid as that

terrence said...

Darwin was at work...

Insolitus said...

I have been under the impression that in a dire situation, drinking your own urine once is beneficial, but after the second passing it would do you more harm than good. Are you saying this is incorrect, and if I ever find myself dying of thirst, I would be advised to leave my zipper alone and just hope for the best?

Gareth said...

Interesting that there were once many crofters in Scotland who were more than capable of living alone in the wilds without any special training.

Anonymous said...

I found this amusing, and it highlights the risk of believing everything you see on TV.
http://socialspew.com/post/5510926885/battle-of-the-badass-bear-grylls-vs-les-stroud

Gareth said...

Bear Grylls once visited a nature reserve and allegedly the first question he asked of the staff was whether he could eat the animals. He didn't actually undet

Gareth said...

Oops. Don't know what happened there:

Final sentence should have read: "He didn't understand that a reserve is somewhere where flora and fauna are protected."