Monday, February 27, 2012

Fireman Sam creator detained at airport for 'racist' scarf comment at security gate

A retired fireman, and creator of the popular children's character, Fireman Sam, was detained at an airport for questioning why a veiled woman was not checked by security. As David Jones arrived at the security gates at Gatwick airport and placed his belongings, including a scarf, into a tray to pass through the X-ray scanner he spotted a Muslim woman in hijab pass through the area without showing her face. In a light-hearted aside to a security official who had been assisting him, he said: “If I was wearing this scarf over my face, I wonder what would happen.” The quip proved to be a mistake. After passing through the gates, he was confronted by staff and accused of racism. He was then subjected to a one hour stand-off as officials tried to force him to apologise. Mr Jones, 67, said: “Something like George Orwell’s 1984 now seems to have arrived in Gatwick airport. I feel that my rights as an individual have been violated.



“What I underwent amounts to intimidation and detention. I was humiliated and degraded in full public view. I am a 67-year-old pensioner and have lived my life within the law. I do not have even one point on my driving licence.” He said that when he made his initial remark the security guard had appeared to agree with him, saying: “I know what you mean, but we have our rules, and you aren’t allowed to say that.” As he went through the metal detecting arch, his artificial hip set off the alarm, prompting a full search from a guard. It was after this that he was confronted by another guard who said he was being detained because he had made an offensive remark. “I repeated to her what I had said and told her that I had said nothing racist,” he said. She took my passport and boarding pass and I was then escorted back through the security zone into the outer area.

“We were then joined by a second female security guard who stated that she was Muslim and was deeply distressed by my comment. I again stated that I had not made a racist remark but purely an observation that we were in a maximum security situation being searched thoroughly whilst a woman with her face covered walked through. I made no reference to race or religion. I did not swear or raise my voice.” He continued: “I had now been detained for some time. We were going around in circles. I maintained that I had said nothing offensive and the security guard was continuing to accuse me. This had taken about 15-20 minutes and looked as though it was not going to be resolved. At this point I asked for the attendance of a police officer. After some time he arrived but it was also plainly evident that he was keeping to the politically correct code.



“I told him that if there was a case then he should arrest me. I was told that we now live in a different time and some things are not to be said. They decided again that I would only be allowed to continue on my journey if I were to apologise to the Muslim guard. My reply was that as I had not made a racist remark it would be impossible for me to apologise.” Mr Jones added: “I felt that I made a logical observation. That while everyone was being subjected to an invasive search it was illogical that someone should be let through with their face covered. I am not opposed to having this level of security but it must be equal for all.” Eventually, Mr Jones said, a BA manager suggested that he should agree that what he had said “could” be considered offensive by a Muslim guard. With his flight departure time now fast approaching Mr Jones agreed to the compromise.

8 comments:

arbroath said...

This happened in England, Anonymous.

Gareth said...

What I don't understand is how this could be racist. The person who assumed that the woman in hijab was of a different race to Jones must themselves be racist.

Nor were Jones' comments in any way a comment on the woman's religion. They were a comment on the clear inequality practiced by the security staff.

The staff are idiots for another reason. There have been cases of men posing as women wearing hijab to avoid security checks.

I hope this story highlights the fact that security staff at Gatwick are extremely lax in their duties.

melissa said...

I don't see how his comments are racist as I believe anyone who covers their face needs to be checked for security reasons (at appropriate venues). A bit off topic but there was a man at my father's old bank who had a facial deformity, which he tended to cover with a baggy hoody. This gentleman worked out a system with the bank management so that he could wear his hoody inside the bank as long as he called before arriving. The gentleman knew that people who cover their faces in areas where security is an issue can cause a panic.

Gareth said...

According to my understanding women who wear hajib can be looked upon by other women. As such airport security only need to make sure they employ at least one woman at any given time to deal with these issues as they arise.

Either we should all be subect to security checks before boarding a plane or nobody should be. If there are exemptions then the only logical conclusion we can draw is that security forces don't really believe there is a threat.

Anonymous said...

I take my hat off to Mr Jones for sticking to his guns on this issue - he has my full support. I for one find it hard to believe that security forces can justify this sort of inequality (and quite frankly, massive security loophole), just in the name of political correctness. By all means respect people's beliefs, but when you let your fear of being labelled a bigot overrule maximum security protocols, you need to re-evaluate your priorities.

And as for the female Muslim security guard who was 'deeply distressed' by a non-racist comment, as my colleague just said - "boo hoo". :p

Anonymous said...

Well, he has a valid point.

Anonymous said...

This will happen more and more in England over the coming years.

Insolitus said...

Good for him for not giving up.