Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Albino woman wants Albino Rhino beer off the menu

A Metro Vancouver woman with albinism has launched a human rights complaint against a popular chain restaurant, saying the restaurant's "albino" branding of menu items is going too far. Ikponwosa (I.K.) Ero filed a complaint with the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal against Earls Restaurants over its "Albino Rhino" line of beer and "Albino Wings Wednesdays." The complaint alleges that the marketing of the "Albino" line is demeaning to Ero and all people with the genetic condition known as albinism and is being done deliberately to evoke a sense of oddness about being albino.

Ero said naming menu items after medical or genetic conditions is not commonly acceptable. "You go into a restaurant and someone says, 'Can I get a palsy? Give me a palsy,'" she said. "And what it stands for is a cerebral palsy cocktail. I don't think that would fly well at all with anybody with cerebral palsy, or their families, who have to live with the condition. So how does it work, in [the case of albinism] that you can market food with a medical condition?"



In her complaint, Ero noted that she was born in Nigeria, where people with albinism are often targeted for ritualistic murder. The threat of violent persecution was part of the reason she and her family fled to Canada when she was a teenager. Mark Barry, vice-president of human resources with Earls Restaurants, issued a statement that said Earls created and named its house beer "Albino Rhino" 25 years ago and in no way meant to be discriminatory or offend.

"The name was chosen because it was fun and whimsical in sound and denoted something rare and special – we felt proud to have such a beautiful animal, the white rhino, representing our brand," Barry said. "It did not occur to us that the name would be associated with albinism, nor did it occur to us it would offend, and in the 25 years we have been serving our beer we have never had a complaint about the name until now."

With news video.

3 comments:

Wild Rumpus said...

I'm from Vancouver and this woman sure isn't getting the respect she was looking for.

We have a provincial Human Rights tribunal here and they are always taking on these stupid cases and it is considered by most to be a kangaroo court...

WilliamRocket said...

Send her back

Frederic said...

his is exactly why these Kangaroo Courts need to be shut down. Anyone with an axe to grind, no matter how trivial or misguided, gets free access to lawyers paid for by the Human Rights Tribunal to 'punish' whoever 'hurt' their far too tender feelings.

It is also deeply procedurally one-sided and unjust. The complainant – a lady suffering from albinism – doesn’t have to pay a penny; BC taxpayers pay for the prosecution of the complaint against Earls. The victims of the complaints have to pay for their own lawyers from their own pockets. Even if they win, they lose – the process has become the punishment. The BC Human Right Tribunal is procedurally unfair. Unlike real courts, there is no way to apply for a dismissal of nuisance lawsuits. Common law rules of evidence don’t apply. Rules of court don’t apply. Hearsay is admitted as evidence.

Funny thing is, the complainant is 'reportedly' studying law. Could this be another ambulance chaser in the making? Do we really need to stroke the ego of another one?