A Colorado woman says she was denied a massage because of her size. Laura Smith had just completed a half marathon in Arizona and couldn't wait for a massage at The Natural Healing Center in Aurora.
"She, the doctor comes out and she says, 'I'm sorry but you're too fat for our tables. You're going to probably break a table and then you'd have to pay for it,'" Smith said.
"And I was like, in shock, like I'm hearing this?" She left the center in tears. She couldn't understand. She's six-foot-three and had massages even before she'd lost 47 pounds to drop to about 250.
Video link.
Penny Wells, the owner of Natural Healing, wouldn't talk on camera, but she says she called Smith "large," not fat. And she worried a table might collapse because one had broken under a 165-pound man.
9 comments:
Last time I checked, the management has a right to refuse service. Grow up, ffs.
It might be a good idea for this kind of business to invest in tables that can hold more than 165 pounds.
Maybe they should get a block and tackle to get her on and off the reinforced table too. Good for her for losing weight, but don't whine when people don't want their livelihoods jeopardized.
Perhaps a StairMaster would be a better life choice than a massage table?
I can't imagine what kind of table wouldn't support 250. Also, she just ran a marathon to the asshat who said to invest in a StairMaster.
Nonsense. I have a portable table that has a max working weight of 800 pounds. Having a table collapse under a 165 pound person is ridiculous. These people need to buy actual decent equipment or at least set it up properly. A standard table would be able to take that weight no problem. Even 250 lbs should not be an issue. How different would these commenters feel if this article was about a 6'5" man? I've had plenty of large people on my table. This is pure discrimination and body shaming.
"How different would these commenters feel if this article was about a 6'5" man?"
I'd think he was an even bigger whiner.
"This is pure discrimination and body shaming"
No it's not, it's the owner of a business choosing whom to do business with. In this case they chose not to as they believed their equipment, and thus livelihood, would be damaged. Simple, no hysteria necessary.
I hope that people will take heed and avoid this place. They may have a right to refuse service, but consumers also have the right to boycott businesses based on their prejudices.
This was said to a prospective patient of a Licensed Acupuncturists office (who uses the designation 'Doctor' - as was awarded by a school in California). This is inappropriate treatment and handling of a prospective patient - no matter what modality of therapy she was walking into the good Doctor's office for.
Post a Comment