Sunday, November 25, 2012

Indian rationalist targeting 'miracles' fights blasphemy charge

When water started trickling down a statue of Jesus Christ at a Catholic church in Mumbai earlier this year, locals were quick to declare a miracle. Some began collecting the holy water and the Church of Our Lady of Velankanni began to promote it as a site of pilgrimage. So when Sanal Edamaruku arrived and established that this was not holy water so much as holey plumbing, the backlash was severe. The renowned rationalist was accused of blasphemy, charged with offences that carry a three-year prison sentence and eventually, after receiving death threats, had to seek exile in Finland. Now he is calling for governments to press Delhi into dropping the case. He has warned that India was sacrificing freedom of expression for outdated, colonial-era rules about blasphemy.


When the state "miracle" was pronounced, he went to Mumbai and found that the dripping water was due to clogged drainage pipes behind the wall where it stood. His revelation provoked death threats from religious zealots and ultimately charges of blasphemy under the Indian penal code in the Mumbai high court. "India cannot criticise Pakistan for arresting young girls for blaspheming against Islam while it arrests and locks up its own citizens for breaking our country's blasphemy laws," he said. "It is an absurd law but also extremely dangerous because it gives fanatics, whether they are Hindus, Catholics or Muslims, a licence to be offended. It also allows people who are in dispute with you to make up false accusations of blasphemy."


Edamaruku said his exposure of the weeping statue was also a contribution to public health in Mumbai as some believers were drinking the water hoping it could cure ailments. "This was sewage water seeping through a wall due to faulty plumbing," he said. "It posed a health risk to people who were fooled into believing it was a miracle." He has been living in Finland since the summer. He was in Europe on a lecture tour in July when his partner rang to say the police had arrived at his flat. "I felt really upset because under the blasphemy law you cannot get bail until the court case begins. I would be in jail now if I had been at my apartment in Delhi," he said.

YouTube link.

He has spurned an offer from a senior Indian Catholic bishop to apologise for the exposure of the "miracle". "The Catholic archbishop of Bombay, Oswald, Cardinal Gracias, has said that if I apologise for the 'offence' I have caused he will see to it that the charges are dropped. This shows that he has influence in the situation but he will not use it unless I apologise, which I will not do as I have done nothing wrong," he said. "In a way I am lucky because I have friends and supporters in Europe. I am well known in India and have the telephone numbers of at least five Indian cabinet ministers. And I have some means of fighting back. But what would happen to the common man or woman if they were accused of blasphemy? They would be sent straight to jail without any chance of bail," he said. Edamaruku has asked for "mounting international pressure" on the Indian government. Delhi had the power to halt the prosecution before a court case, citing a lack of evidence to pursue it, he said.

There's an audio report about Sanal Edamaruku here.


Barbwire said...

Blasphemy. In a "civilized" country. A serious crime. The only difference between India and Pakistan on this is that it applies to all religions in India and only Islam in Pakistan--basically because they think all other religions are blasphemy. I had thought better of India. Oh, well.

Mike said...

When someone defends religious fervor with 'Well, who does it hurt? If it makes you feel better...' this is an example of 'hurt'. Apart from the gentleman who disclosed the source of the holy water, anyone who consumes the water themselves or provides it someone susceptible of illness is at risk. And people spending money they can ill afford to visit the place - it hurts them, too.